|
First Nonproft Phishing Scam? How to Fight Back
Authorities are investigating an alleged phishing scam targeting the United Way. The web domain "uniteways.org" registered to a French company had a site operating for at least a week that was soliciting donations. Uniteways.org has no affiliation with the United Way, and no apparent nonprofit status or legitimate reason for soliciting funds in the U.S. The site is no longer operating. Yet another deceptively close domain, unitedways.org, hosts a generic search screen. According to "Whois," the online registry of domains, unitedways.org is registered to NameRealtors.com of Miami Beach. Phishing is a scam that attempts to trick online users into giving up personal financial information at phony sites that look like the legitimate sites. Popular phishing schemes purport to be Paypal or traditional banks. Phishers send out emails purporting to be from the financial institution, stating that the user's account has been put on hold pending the "confirmation" of certain financial data. While identity fraud is still a bigger problem offline than online, phishing is a major source of online fraud. Prompt action by the United Way, including discovery, reporting to authorities, and an announcement on their web site, helped minimize the damage. We became aware of the problem by reading an article in our local paper which quoted our local United Way office. Many nonprofits would be tempted to hide such news, either out of shame or the misplaced fear that frightened donors would stop giving online to the real nonprofit as well. But denial of a crime helps only the criminals. Donors need confidence in the online financial system, and prompt prosecution of scam artists builds confidence. What else can nonprofits do? Here's a short list: 1. Register the domains that might easily be confused with yours. Had the United Way registered "uniteways.org" this scam wouldn't have worked. Register the .com and possibly the .net derivatives of your .org name as well. Buy the ones that are so close to yours a typical donor might be confused. March 2005 | |
|
|
|